San Francisco's Domestic Terrorists
For several weeks now, my City has been under terrorist attack. Many
people remember the attacks on New York in 2001. Although I wouldn't
claim that the attacks on San Francisco this month were quite as severe,
I would argue that they exceed the qualifications of terrorist actions
compared to those perpetrated in September of 2001.
The logical definition of terrorism is actions or threats which cause
"terror" in those to whom the actions or threats are directed. Terror
should be qualified, of course, to mean something more severe than mere
inconvenience or change in habits. Terror in men is the conscious confirmation
that life as it needs to be led is impossible - that the actions of
an outside force are causing a threat to one's life and the pursuit
of that which furthers its goals and success.
The goal of San Francisco's terrorist population is the destruction
of life. The results of their actions have been the destruction of the
motors of the City. Everyone touched by the actions of the terrorists
have seen their lives changed in a destructive way. This is what is
meant by terrorism, and why they as individuals and as a group can be
classified as nothing else. Their actions surpass the terrorist nature
of those of the September 2001 terrorists in many ways, if not (yet)
with the latter's destructive results. Their actions have touched me
personally in ways the September 2001 actions never could have, both
due to the proximity of the activity and the nature of the terrorists
themselves.
In 2001, the terrorists were foreigners. They were seen by all rational
Americans as the enemy, and their intent was universally acknowledged
as life-destroying and inhuman. The terrorists on the streets this month
are not being so simply identified, and it is truly frightening: their
actions destroy life, and destroy wealth (the two are essentially the
same); their ranks are filled with American citizens and often everyday,
middle-class ones at that; they are not perpetrating actions against
highly visible and widely-recognized monuments, and thus their actions
are not as visible from outside their immediate locale. Yet the destruction
can be seen and felt severely by all who live and work in this City.
Strangely, however, the outpouring of unity and solidarity which took
place after the 2001 attacks has not materialized from these.
San Francisco's domestic terrorists have atrophied the men who keep
the motors of the City running: the men who built this city and continue
to make it prosper. Like mucous and bile in the throat of an asthmatic,
they block offices and transit routes to prevent business from functioning,
to prevent commerce from commencing each business morning. They make
small business and shop owners spend their time guarding their goods
and storefronts rather than selling their wares and interfacing with
customers. They cause restaurants and coffeehouses to close, hemorrhaging
revenues and turning tip-dependent wage-earners away from their jobs
day after day. Their destruction of real property results in funneling
wealth away from its owner's intentions and preventing the creation
of new jobs and new commercial endeavors. Their activity focuses on
destroying the city and every logical function of the city: they are
shutting down the human market of the mind in favor of the law of the
jungle.
They are threatening death to the City by causing all available resources
to be funneled away from real law enforcement and toward the waging
of a war by police. The enhanced police presence creates a hostile environment
in which productive, law-respecting individuals must fear for their
person every time they pass a team of tired, overworked officers, made
nervous by a dozen straight hours of provocation and mistreatment by
terrorists. They further slow the production of wealth and the maintenance
of every man's life by standing in the way of such basic needs as eating
and sleeping - for life cannot be successfully lived in an environment
of dark shop windows and unending helicopter bleatings and siren screams.
Citizens of every third-world dictatorship will confirm the difficulty
of enduring in such a world.
As I walk to work in the morning, traffic is backed up and roads are
closed off. The sidewalks are closed and I have to reroute my steps.
The police are everywhere and I trace my every move, their hands on
pistols, suspicious of everyone and everything. Their faces are drained,
their limbs sore from days of overtime controlling crowds and fighting
abuse. How can I know their ultimate ability to distinguish me from
the terrorists? I wonder. Have I done my part to distinguish myself?
Is any American doing his part? Why are we living in such terror and
fearing every moment when the simple act of ending our tolerance of
these terrorists and ending our sanction of their activities would end
their destruction? Why do we allow them to live, when their goal is
the destruction of our lives, and of life in general?
I continue to wonder this every morning when I awake to hear them
praised. Praised for the bravery of their "position" or "opinion". Praised
that they are showing the "courage" to destroy my life and the life
of my City. I was afraid of the world I lived in after the foreign terrorists
destroyed a few blocks of New York in 2001. I'm more afraid of it than
ever today, when those blocks are in the City in which I live, and the
terrorists are home-grown and sanctioned by the government, the media,
and most of my neighbors.
The fact that their actions makes them worse than the conventional
definition of terrorists (as qualified by the events of September 2001)
makes a new description necessary perhaps. They need to be described
as what they represent, physically and philosophically, from what their
voices advocate to what their actions perpetrate. To San Francisco's
domestic terrorists, in the name of your hatred of life and all that
makes it possible, I dub thee: The walking dead. I never thought it
possible that I would hate any of my fellow men enough to arrive at
such a conclusion, and I hate you even more that you have brought me
to this today...
|